Mediastinoscopy: looking beyond lung cancer staging
Editorial

Mediastinoscopy: looking beyond lung cancer staging

Rajat Kumar, Benjamin Wei

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama-Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA

Correspondence to: Benjamin Wei. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama-Birmingham Medical Center, ZRB 739, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. Email: bwei@uabmc.edu.

Comment on: Onat S, Ates G, Avcı A, et al. The role of mediastinoscopy in the diagnosis of non-lung cancer diseases. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2017;13:939-43.


Received: 10 March 2017; Accepted: 03 January 2018; Published: 31 March 2018.

doi: 10.21037/med.2018.03.05


While staging of lung cancer remains the leading indication for the use of mediastinoscopy, its utility is equally applicable to diagnosis of mediastinal lesions unrelated to bronchogenic carcinoma (1,2). The authors present a multitude of disease processes presenting with mediastinal adenopathy where obtaining tissue diagnosis is paramount. For these patients, as presented by the authors, expeditious diagnosis prevents further unnecessary evaluation and allows appropriate treatment initiation, few of which are surgical.

Although endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) has become more prevalent, occasionally a definitive diagnosis cannot be obtained with this method, particularly in cases of suspected lymphoma (3). EBUS-FNA has proven to be a highly user-dependent modality. In this study, roughly 20% of patients who ultimately received a mediastinoscopy had undergone previous non-diagnostic transbronchial biopsy. Sarcoidosis, on the other hand, is typically readily amenable to EBUS-FNA to achieve the diagnosis. As the authors point out, however, in regions such as theirs where infectious granulomatous diseases such as tuberculosis are prevalent, mediastinoscopy allows for a more definitive diagnosis of sarcoidosis. This manuscript shows that mediastinoscopy has a reliable yield in experienced hands.

Similarly, the authors’ documented rate of complications is comparable to low rates reported in other large series. Part of this may have to do with the preferential biopsy of lymph nodes at the right paratracheal stations (2R, 4R), rather than the subcarinal [7] or left paratracheal nodes (2L, 4L). Although this is not stated in the manuscript, experienced mediastino scopists know that the recurrent laryngeal nerve is at risk at the left paratracheal stations, and that the subcarinal nodes are more prone to intraoperative bleeding (4). When not performing a “staging” mediastinoscopy for lung cancer, accessing representative abnormal lymph nodes located in the right paratracheal vicinity likely harbors lower risk than biopsy of the left paratracheal and subcarinal stations, and is sufficient for diagnosis. The authors report no instances of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, reoperation for hematoma, or need for sternotomy to control bleeding (5). Given their excellent clinical results, we would argue that the routine 24-hour hospital stay advocated by the authors may not be necessary.

Mediastinoscopy can be safely applied to the broad range of inflammatory and infectious etiologies of mediastinal lymphadenopathy (6). Continued practice of and experience with EBUS-FNA will allow for further improvements in the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions. Nevertheless, mediastinoscopy remains a necessary tool in the arsenal of the thoracic surgeon to readily diagnose a variety of benign and malignant diseases of the mediastinum.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned and reviewed by Section Editor Dr. Zhuoqi Jia (Thoracic Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China).

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/med.2018.03.05). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Porte H, Roumilhac D, Eraldi L, et al. The role of mediastinoscopy in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:196-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Forse RA, Dutton JW, Munro DD. Mediastinoscopy for diagnosing diseases of the lung other than primary carcinoma. Can J Surg 1978;21:438-40. [PubMed]
  3. Iqbal S, DePew ZS, Kurtin PJ. Endobronchial ultrasound and lymphoproliferative disorders: a retrospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:1830-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Wei B, Bryant AS, Minnich DJ, et al. The safety and efficacy of mediastinoscopy when performed by general thoracic surgeon. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:1878-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Hammoud ZT, Anderson RC, Meyers BF, et al. The current role of mediastinoscopy in the evaluation of thoracic disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:894-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Lemaire A, Nikolic I, Petersen T, et al. Nine-year single center experience with cervical mediastinoscopy: complications and false negative rate. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:1185-9; discussion 1189-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/med.2018.03.05
Cite this article as: Kumar R, Wei B. Mediastinoscopy: looking beyond lung cancer staging. Mediastinum 2018;2:27.

Download Citation